Reminder: Pharmboy is available to chat with Members, comments are found below each post.

In this article, I want to revisit an article I wrote two years ago titled, “The Calm Before the Storm.” My article was focused on the patent cliff that was looming, that was later picked up by the New York Times and several other bloggers! Subsequent articles were about big pharma companies, their revenue streams, and the pros and cons of much of their later stage pipeline. My other articles have noted smaller biotechs with the potential to reap big rewards, and possible acquisition candidates by those big pharma companies that need to fill their coffers with new, multi-billion dollar drugs -the so called blockbusters.

Forbes has a good article projected three different scenarios, but the one that stands out to me is the last figure (below) showing if all things adding up together, who weathers the storm?

In the ‘Storm’ article, it is noted that pharma growth rates should be growing less or starting to stall into 2014 due to the patent cliffs (see Table 1). A few examples slow growing revenue streams are (2010 -2011): Pfizer $67.1B to $67.4B; Merck $46B to $48B, JNJ $62B to $62B, and AMGN $15.1 to $15.5.

Table 1. Patent Cliff 2010 – 2012
Company Drug Indication Sales in $B (2009) Patent Expiration
Pfizer/Eisai Aricept Alzheimer’s 1 2010
Merck Cozaar Hypertension 3.6 2010
Pfizer Lipitor Cholesterol 12.5 2011
JnJ Levaquin Antibiotic 1.5 2011
Sanofi/BMS Plavix Anticoagulant 9.3 2011
AstraZeneca Seroquel Antipsychotic 4.9 2011
Lilly Zyprexa Antipsychotic 4.9 2011
Merck Singulair Asthma 4.7 2012
Forest Labs/Lundbenk Lexapro Antidepressant 2.3 2012
AstraZeneca Symbicort Asthma 2.3 2012
Novartis Diovan Hypertension 2.9 2012
49.9

There are two ways that pharma companies can grow, acquisitions or internal innovation. In…
continue reading