Hope all had a quiet and relaxing weekend. I know I did, as the summer weather has been so wonderful that being outside is easy with the temperature rarely exceeding 85 degrees because the onshore breeze blows in from the ocean consistently day after day …
Okay, I am in a good mood. You caught me! In fact, I feel so good, the obvious but understandable mistake I made about the Elliott Wave Principle isn’t bothering me, nor is the email below that points that error out, and has another gripe or two …
Dear Trader Ed,
Re: article on Elliott Wave
- First of all, it’s Elliott (two ts) not Elliot.
Thank you. This one got away from me, as will happen from time to time, and kudos to you for paying close enough attention to see my error.
- 2nd of all, what’s the point of this article?
I would love to respond to this, but I have no clue which article you are referencing. I wrote three pieces about the Elliott Wave Theory (Principle).
- 3rd of all, email is a dead box.
Is this a riddle? Or is this a legitimate complaint about a function on this site? Again, I am clueless, which brings me to an important point …
Folks, as you might have guessed by now, I am big on communicating clearly. If one wants accuracy in answers, one has to form the questions accurately, or, if it is not a question, such as the email above, then one has to make the points accurately, especially if the points are a complaint, which the tone of the email above suggests. To all who write me, please take the time to form your writing so it is clear and accurate. Thanks, and I am still in a good mood.
Trade in the day; invest in your life …
Trader Ed
