Daily State of the Markets 
Thursday Morning – May 27, 2010  

Yesterday morning, we talked about the concept of asking the right questions when trying to determine the driving forces behind the stock markets movements. So with the market once again displaying an extreme level of volatility Wednesday afternoon, my main question was if the recent bouts of program selling were meaningful or just noise that needs to be filtered out?

At first blush, the fact that the market gave away a very nice gain and wound up finishing with a loss on Wednesday appeared to be simply horrendous price action. The words one of my colleagues used to describe the dive were, “this just isn’t good.” Another friend called to ask if the move from +140 to -69 qualified as an “ARF” (abrupt rally failure). And to be sure, the reasons behind the swoon were not encouraging as word that Germany’s bond auction had failed and that China was talking openly about losing some of its Eurozone debt holdings clearly caused the computers to “seek and destroy.”

On a chart basis, my colleague was correct – the price action definitely wasn’t good. It appeared that the rally, which stemmed from Tuesday’s key reversal, had bumped its head on resistance at 10,200 on the Dow and then turned tail and ran. Thus, Wednesday’s decline appeared to reverse the reversal – on increased volume, which, by definition, isn’t good at all.

However, knowing what was causing the programs to do a little selling here and there made it possible to ask the right question: Was China REALLY going to do anything about their holdings of Eurozone debt. For if they did want to suddenly start dumping the PIGIS’ bonds, the key question would become: Sell? To whom?

In addition, if one took a moment to think in between issuing sell orders, they’d realize that while China is famous for “talking the talk” and voicing their opinions about all kinds of global economic issues, there isn’t a darn thing they can do about the debt issued by the Eurozone at this point in time. Just like there is no way they are going to start selling dollars or U.S. Treasuries anytime soon. Thus, the bottom line is that China’s forex holdings are just too darn big to have any choice but to hold. Sure, they can voice their displeasure about the money they are losing, but there really isn’t much they can do about it at this stage of the game.

So, after enduring yet another day of “boys and their toys” (i.e. the high-powered computer generated trading programs) my key takeaway is the recent up-and-down action might just be part of the basing process. My recollection of waterfall declines is that they do end, but that the volatility tends to stick around for a while. So… unless the bears are able to break below the recent lows, it might be best to, like China, just hold on the next time the computers start running away with the market.

Turning to this morning… China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) firmly denied the media report that it is reviewing its Eurozone debt holdings.

On the economoic front, the government’s report (1st revision) on the nation’s first quarter GDP shows the economy grew at an annualized rate of 3.0% in the first quarter, which was below the expectations for a growth rate of 3.4%, and below the 3.2% projected in the first read. In addition, the current quarter is down significantly from the 5.6% growth rate seen in the fourth quarter. Looking at consumer activity, the Personal Consumption component of the report came below expectations with a gain of 3.5%, which was below the estimates for 3.8% but well above and last quarter’s reading of 1.6%. On the inflation front, the GDP Price index was a tenth higher than expectations at 1.0% and the Core PCE was a in line with consensus at +0.6%.

In addition, the Labor Department reported that initial claims for unemployment insurance for the week ending May 22 fell by 14,000 to 460K. The week’s total was a bit above the Reuters consensus for a reading of 455K. Continuing Claims for unemployment for the week ending May 15 were a smidge below consensus at 4.607M vs. expectations for 4.613M. For comparison purposes, last week’s revised total was 4.636M (from 4.625M).

Finally, regardless of the color on the screen, make every effort to enjoy the day…

Pre-Game Indicators

Here are the important indicators we review each morning before the opening bell…

  • Major Foreign Markets:
    • Australia: +1.59%
    • Shanghai: +1.15%
    • Hong Kong: +1.22%
    • Japan: +1.23%
    • France: +1.98%
    • Germany: +2.37%
    • London: +1.89%

     

  • Crude Oil Futures: +$1.78 to $73.29
  • Gold: -$6.40 to $1207.00
  • Dollar: Higher against Yen, Euro, and Pound
  • 10-Year Bond Yield: Currently trading at 3.28%

     

  • Stocks Futures Ahead of Open in U.S. (relative to fair value): 
    • S&P 500: +15.5
    • Dow Jones Industrial Average: +118
    • NASDAQ Composite: +29  

Wall Street Research Summary

Upgrades:

Annaly Capital (NLY) – BofA/Merrill Illinois Tool (ITW) – Barclays BRE Properties (BRE) – Benchmark Hess Corporation (HES) – Benchmark Microsoft (MSFT) – FBR Capital Fluor (FLR) – Goldman Sachs Gamestop (GME) – Janney Capital Stericycle (SRCL) – Wunderlich Securities

Downgrades:

Waddell & Reed (WDR) – Citi Foster Wheeler (FWLT) – Goldman Sachs Quanta Services (PWR) – Goldman Sachs

Long positions in stocks mentioned: none

For more “top stock” portfolios and research, visit TopStockPortfolios.com

 


The opinions and forecasts expressed are those of David Moenning, founder of TopStockPortfolios.com and may not actually come to pass. Mr. Moenning’s opinions and viewpoints regarding the future of the markets should not be construed as recommendations. The analysis and information in this report and on our website is for informational purposes only. No part of the material presented in this report or on our websites is intended as an investment recommendation or investment advice. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed nor any Portfolio constitutes a solicitation to purchase or sell securities or any investment program. The opinions and forecasts expressed are those of the editors of TopStockPortfolios and may not actually come to pass. The opinions and viewpoints regarding the future of the markets should not be construed as recommendations of any specific security nor specific investment advice. Stocks should always consult an investment professional before making any investment.

Any investment decisions must in all cases be made by the reader or by his or her investment adviser. Do NOT ever purchase any security without doing sufficient research. There is no guarantee that the investment objectives outlined will actually come to pass. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Neither the editor, employees, nor any of their affiliates shall have any liability for any loss sustained by anyone who has relied on the information provided.

The analysis provided is based on both technical and fundamental research and is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Although the information contained is derived from sources which are believed to be reliable, they cannot be guaranteed.

The information contained in our websites and TopStockPortfolios publications is provided by Ridge Publishing Co. Inc. (Ridge). One of the principals of Ridge, Mr. David Moenning, is also President and majority shareholder of Heritage Capital Management, Inc. (HCM) a Chicago-based money management firm. HCM is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser. HCM also serves as a sub-advisor to other investment advisory firms. Ridge is a publisher and has not registered as an investment adviser. Neither HCM nor Ridge is registered as a broker-dealer.

Employees and affiliates of HCM and Ridge may at times have positions in the securities referred to and may make purchases or sales of these securities while publications are in circulation. Editors will indicate whether they or HCM has a position in stocks or other securities mentioned in any publication. The disclosures will be accurate as of the time of publication and may change thereafter without notice.

Investments in equities carry an inherent element of risk including the potential for significant loss of principal. Past performance is not an indication of future results.